Joe Biden calls Russia’s actions in Ukraine ‘genocide’ | War in Ukraine

Joe Biden therefore seems to have made his own, publicly, the position hammered out for several days by Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky.

His statement was made, like others before them, in a surprising context, since he was speaking at a bioethanol production plant in Iowa, where he detailed, among other things, what his administration was doing to reduce costs for American families.

Announcing an initiative to expand the use of an ethanol-based gasoline blend, Joe Biden pointed the finger at Moscow for inflation affecting Americans.

Your family budget, your ability to fuel up, none of that should depend on a dictator declaring war and committing genocide on the other side of the world.he launched.

To help cope with this price increase [attribuable] to Putin, I authorized the release of a million barrels a day from the strategic oil reserve he continued.

Questioned by journalists a few hours later, Joe Biden did not seek to temper his remarks, unlike other recent situations where he preceded the official position of his administration.

Yes, I called it genocide because it’s increasingly clear that Putin is trying to erase the very idea of ​​being a Ukrainian. »

A quote from Joe Biden, President of the United States

And the evidence is mounting, it’s different than it was last weekhe said, denouncing the horrible things done by Russians in Ukraine.

We will let the lawyers [en droit] international decide [si les actes commis atteignent le niveau de] genocide, but it looks like it to mehe said, believing that we would learn growing on devastation.

The very charged term brandished by the American president – ​​genocide has been dubbed the crime of crimes contrasts with comments made earlier by his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin.

Our task is to achieve the set objectives while minimizing losses. We will act harmoniously, calmlysupported the master of the Kremlin, who persists in qualifying the war launched against the neighboring country asspecial military operation.

The testimonies of Ukrainian civilians and the numerous international media reports day after day paint a horrifying reality.

Bombardment of civilian areas targeting, for example, schools, hospitals and residential areas, acts of torture, deliberate killings of civilians, rapes: allegations against the Russian military are multiplying about acts which would at least constitute crimes of war under international law.

At the start of the day, Volodymyr Zelensky also denounced the “hundreds of rapes” observed in the areas previously occupied by the Russian army, including on underage girls and toddlers

A term hitherto avoided

If President Zelensky denounced at the beginning of the month a genocide after the discovery of corpses, probably of civilians executed by Russian forces in Boutcha, a suburb of kyiv, Washington had so far remained cautious, unlike, for example, Poland .

We have seen atrocities, we have seen war crimes, we have yet to see a level of systematic deprivation of life of the Ukrainian people that reaches the level of genocidesaid US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan earlier this month.

For there to be genocide, recognized by international law, according to the UN, there must be an intention to destroy the targeted group, which is very difficult to prove.

In the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide approved in 1948 by the UN, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part , a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

  • (a) Murder of members of the group;
  • (b) Serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
  • (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
  • (d) Measures intended to prevent births within the group;
  • (e) Forced transfer of children from the group to another group. »

A word heavy with meaning avoided again just two days ago: The label [apposée à ce qui se passe] is less important than the fact that these acts are cruel, criminal, evil and diabolical, and that they must be answered decisivelySullivan said on CNN.

Similarly, Joe Biden had for the first time called his Russian counterpart a “war criminal”, almost on the fly, last month, contrasting with the cautious tone adopted until then by his administration since the start of the offensive. Russian in Ukraine.

It was only days later that the State Department, which had previously insisted on its investigations, formally assessed that Russia was committing war crimes in Ukraine.

Subsequently, Joe Biden had impromptu estimated that Vladimir Putin could “not stay in power” at the end of a speech delivered in Warsaw, forcing the White House to backpedal in the following days.

He himself then seemed to downplay his remarks, saying they did not reflect a change in his administration’s policy towards Russia, but rather his own moral outrage.

Leave a Comment